wooo great

--
sorry for my baaad english

well, gotta say that I appreciate your traditional methods more than digital

This looks so awesome! It's like a photo! I like the atmosphere here. Lovely. ^^

--
TV kills creativity.


The Vampire Trilogy

read comics ->nete's comicspace

I've been a bit concerned why my traditional work is better than the digital. Do you have any clue? Are my digital work too clean? Do they lack texture?

--
My online portfolio

well...now you mentioned it, maybe it's lack of texture. I once thought about the differences between digital and traditional and came up to a conclusion that traditional forgives more. If you're making digital pic, people expect to see "sharp", fine-detailed work. Please note; this was common opinion, not referring anything particular. Guess the basic brush still makes more lively tracks. More easily even. If you're going to achieve the same feeling doing the same pic as digital, you need to do double work for it (please forget the time oil needs to get dry ). As said, digital is expected to be sharp and amount of making all details is larger than in traditional media.

Whoa...would this make any sense?! Anyways, this was only my humble opinion. Not the common truth. But still I think most of your digital works are masterpieces! Especially when you're describing nature!

--
TV kills creativity.


The Vampire Trilogy

read comics ->nete's comicspace

First off, amazing work. Really, I love the detail you added and just very well done. But, I'm not exactly here to tell you how amazing this is.

First off, the path. Is it going to the house? Does it go on into the woods? Does it do both? These are questions that shouldn't be there. If it's going to the house, it starts it's bend too late, at least for your avrage path, it's not by a lot, could just be me, but it's something.
If it just continues into the words, I would say make it a little longer, just to stop that questionm from coming up, same with if it does both.

Next point is little red: First I believe her legs are too thin for her body, unless she's wearing very baggy clothing. Either her arms are too short(which I don't believe) or the knees start too late- or the size of the legs. Another thing, is her arms. Her left arm looks weird bending like that, and whatever happened to the rest of her hand? Other than that, it's a very good arm, just posed a little funny, I know you used ref, but it turned out, at least here, somewhat strange, and I'm not sure why.

Lastly, is the tree closest to Red leefless or...
Because, with the lighting it looks like the leaves don't belong on the tree behind it, because it's dramticly different from the rest of the leaves, but they also don't look part of the tree in front of it.

All and all, though, this is an amazing picture, great job!

--
Die Römer haben auch später diesen Schock nie überwunden. Was aus dem Norden kam und Blond war, blieb ihr Trauma

_{Faith in Humanity Points: 190}

Just beautifull..nice work indeed..Cheers

--
HASANSGRAFIX

My FASHION BRAND SERIES [Still On] LEVIS DESIGN: [link]

Beautiful piece of work!

--
You want cute and colourful? ---> [link]

wow, this is beautifull

--
my art account *away-with-the-fae
My photography account ~fae-photography

I think this piece is very beautiful, I love the limited colour use actually, makes the piece look very crisp and clean.

--
A heart at the end of its' tether
Swiftly descending into blame,
Pain lasts only a minute,
Resounds through generations forever;
The aftermath, it spells my name.

Thanks! You really gave thought for your comment. I agree with you on all the points. For the leaves, they a looked a bit strange in the reference so I tried to copy them as they were in that picture. Maybe I still missed something from the reference. Actually I did blend those branches with the tree after scanning the painting. Maybe I'll fix that digitally afterwards

--
My online portfolio